We have already discussed the similarities between Aeneas and Hector in class but I wanted to beat the Trojan horse a little bit more. To start with, the Greeks do not tend to demonize their enemies in their stories and, as a result, make themselves look bad in some aspects - a phenomenon that Virgil both takes advantage of and takes care to avoid as a similar trait within his own work. The Greek stories spend more time with the Greek heroes, as one would expect. Since they have more exposure, they also have more flaws, increasing sympathy for the family man Hector from those of us not involved in an ongoing rivalry with the Trojans/future Romans. This firmly establishes Hector as a Trojan family man and war hero, while Achilles, Agamemnon, and Odysseus must all prove themselves again and again - and face consequences when they succumb to their hubris. Hector dies because of Zeus's scale and Athena's trickery, not any fault of his own. Aeneas is instantly designed to become the new Hector: a Trojan family man and war hero, better than the Greeks in every way. As I already said, Virgil does not replicate the Greek tendency to let enemies remain enemies rather than demons. Aeneas passes every test that the Greek heroes struggled with - similar to Hector, who had to face Achilles, Odysseus, and Agamemnon together (excepting Achilles's tantrum) in war, while we hear little about any other legendary Trojan heroes to help him in what seems to be a three on one major player battle. Aeneas also requires divine intervention to move him along toward his fate. While in Hector's case the fated destination is death, Zeus and Athena make sure it happens. Aeneas requires Jove to scare him on toward Italy and the establishment of Rome.
 |
| Hector, Andromache, and Astyanax (Son) |
 |
| Aeneas, Creusa (Wife), Anchises (Father), and Ascanius (Son) |
While Aeneas and Hector are similar in many ways, the one thing Aeneas has going for him is that the gods, or at least one god, is in favor of him. This particularly stands out to me from Hector because during his and Achilles' great battle, no god came to aid, but rather deceive him. I think that Aeneas, becoming the next family man in the story, was used to help relieve pain or sorrow for the audience. With Aeneas, there is now hope for the Trojans, giving the story more fuel to the fire. Hector and Aeneas, I think we used to bring the story closer to the people, so that could more easily relate, to the family man. Both were honorable men, that lived up to full-fill their destiny.
ReplyDeleteYeah. That was not a fair fight. Hector got played...
DeleteI love that you brought up the lopsidedness between Hector's portrayal written by the Greeks and the depiction of the Greeks written by Romans. Homer showed both sides of the story. He gave us an opportunity to choose who we wanted to root for. I naturally rooted for my family man, Hector. I'm sure many of you were Achilles fans or Odysseus fans, but the major point to focus on is that we had a choice. For Aeneas's story, it is as if the Greeks are being put on blast and liking them is almost impossible. We do see parallels between Hector and Aeneas. They both care very deeply for their family and do what they have to do for the greater good of their people. I think the main difference I see is Aeneas's obsession with his prophecy. I don't think that Hector would have been so selfish and prophecy driven as Aeneas shows as he leaves Dido behind.
ReplyDeleteI guess The Aeneid is the one case where you could say that history was actually written by the LOSERS...
DeleteI think another big thing to be considered is that while hector has a very human appearance, Aneas seems almost too perfect, and as if he couldn't be a real person.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed this post. I liked how you briefly, yet effectively, compared these "heroes." Ever since we have been introduced to Hector, I have been his number one fan. I always rooted for him, and felt like he was the most deserving out of all the characters. It really made me mad that his fate was totally out of his hands. It just seemed unwarranted to me; I couldn't understand it. I felt for him, because he was genuine and always did what he felt was the right thing to do. Of course, someone could simply make the argument that "that's life," but he really did not deserve to die and have his body brutally treated after.
ReplyDeleteI like this post! I think it's also interesting that while sacrifice was required along the way in both men's journeys, Hector's ultimately led to his own demise while Aeneas did not. Hector's focus was on preserving Troy and saving his family, even at the expense of his own life, while Aeneas was all about founding a new city, finding a new start.
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Cheyenne--I hadn't thought about that aspect of the poems before.
ReplyDeleteP.S. Great title, too...
Delete